Chantal Panozzo and her husband, who reside within the Chicago suburbs, anticipated their first routine colonoscopies could be free — totally lined by insurance coverage as preventive care below federal legislation.
Taylor Glascock/KFF Well being Information
disguise caption
toggle caption
Taylor Glascock/KFF Well being Information
Chantal Panozzo and her husband, who reside within the Chicago suburbs, anticipated their first routine colonoscopies could be free — totally lined by insurance coverage as preventive care below federal legislation.
Taylor Glascock/KFF Well being Information
Chantal Panozzo and her husband adopted their main care medical doctors’ orders final yr after they each turned 45, now the really useful age to begin screening for colorectal most cancers. They scheduled their first routine colonoscopies just a few months aside.
Panozzo mentioned she was excited to get a colonoscopy, of all issues, as a result of it meant free care. The couple run a enterprise out of their suburban dwelling close to Chicago and buy protection costing greater than $1,400 every month for his or her household of 4 on the state’s medical health insurance alternate, which was created by the Inexpensive Care Act.
Invoice of the Month is a crowdsourced investigation by KFF Well being Information and NPR that dissects and explains medical payments. Do you might have an attention-grabbing medical invoice you need to share with us? Inform us about it!
By legislation, preventive providers — together with routine colonoscopies — can be found at zero price to sufferers. So Panozzo mentioned she anticipated their screenings could be totally lined.
“This was our probability to get our free preventative care,” she mentioned.
Their outcomes got here again regular, she mentioned.
Then the payments got here.
The sufferers: Chantal Panozzo, who makes use of her maiden identify professionally, now 46, and Brian Opyd, 45, are lined by Blue Cross and Blue Protect of Illinois.
Medical providers: Two routine colonoscopies (one for him, one for her), as really useful by the U.S. Preventive Providers Activity Pressure for sufferers starting at age 45.
Service supplier: Illinois Gastroenterology Group in Hinsdale. The follow is a part of the personal equity-backed GI Alliance, which has greater than 800 gastroenterologists working in 15 states, together with Florida, Missouri, and Texas.
Complete invoice: For every colonoscopy, the gastroenterology group charged $2,034 earlier than any insurance coverage reductions or reductions. After reductions, Blue Cross and Blue Protect of Illinois mentioned it was answerable for paying $395.18 for Brian’s screening and $389.24 for Chantal’s.
However other than the screening prices, the overall included a $600 cost for every affected person — although preliminary insurance coverage paperwork didn’t establish what the cost was for. This left Chantal and Brian every with a $250 invoice, the quantity allowed by BCBS of Illinois, which was utilized to their deductibles.
What offers: Panozzo and her husband’s expertise exposes a loophole within the legislation meant to ensure zero-cost preventive providers: Well being care suppliers might invoice how they select so long as they abide by their contracts with insurance coverage — together with for no matter items or providers they select to checklist, and in ways in which may depart sufferers with surprising payments for “free” care.
After their screenings, Panozzo mentioned she and her husband every noticed the identical unusual $600 cost from the Illinois Gastroenterology Group on their insurance coverage rationalization of advantages statements. Payments from the gastroenterology group defined these expenses have been for “surgical provides.” Her insurer finally advised her the codes have been for “surgical trays.”
At first, she was confused, Panozzo mentioned: Why have been they receiving any payments in any respect?
The Inexpensive Care Act requires preventive care providers to be totally lined with none price sharing imposed on sufferers — procedures akin to colonoscopies, mammograms, and cervical most cancers checks.
Policymakers included this hallmark safety as a result of, for a lot of sufferers, price can deter them from searching for care. A KFF ballot in 2022 discovered that roughly 4 in 10 adults skipped or postponed care they wanted attributable to price issues.
Below the legislation, although, it’s the insurer’s accountability to make preventive care obtainable at zero-cost to sufferers. Suppliers might exploit this loophole, mentioned Sabrina Corlette, a analysis professor and co-director of the Heart on Well being Insurance coverage Reforms at Georgetown College.
“The insurance coverage firm is meant to pay the total declare, however there is no such thing as a requirement on the supplier to code the declare appropriately,” Corlette mentioned.
On this case, BCBS of Illinois lined the total price of the screenings the couple acquired, in response to its personal paperwork. However these paperwork additionally confirmed that every affected person was on the hook for a portion of their separate, $600 expenses.
Panozzo thought a telephone name along with her insurer, BCBS of Illinois, would rapidly repair the error. However she mentioned she spent most of her time on maintain and couldn’t get a solution as to why the colonoscopy got here with a separate cost for provides. She mentioned she discovered in later communications along with her insurer that the $600 was particularly for “surgical trays.”
BCBS of Illinois declined to remark regardless of receiving a waiver authorizing the insurer to debate the case.
Panozzo mentioned that she referred to as the gastroenterology follow and was advised by a billing consultant that the additional cost was a part of an association the follow has with BCBS: She recalled being advised that the follow was accustomed to keying in a billing code for “surgical trays” in lieu of a separate payment, which was described to Panozzo as a “use price” for the physician’s workplace.
“I used to be getting a distinct story from any individual I talked to,” Panozzo mentioned.
She mentioned she was caught in “no man’s land,” with either side telling her the opposite was answerable for eradicating the cost.
The decision: Panozzo went vast along with her objections, contesting the overall $500 they owed by submitting appeals along with her insurer; lodging a grievance with the Illinois Division of Insurance coverage; and writing to her elected officers, warning that Illinois shoppers have been being “taken benefit of” and “ripped off.”
In the end, BCBS authorized each appeals, saying neither Panozzo nor her husband was anticipated to pay the costs.
An administrative worker reached by telephone on the Illinois Gastroenterology Group location the place the couple was handled mentioned they might not remark and directed KFF Well being Information to contact an govt with GI Alliance, the nationwide group that manages the follow. Neither the chief nor media relations representatives responded to a number of requests for remark.
Panozzo mentioned that, previously, she would have paid the invoice to keep away from losing time haggling with the physician, insurer, or each. However getting hit with the identical invoice twice? That was an excessive amount of for her to simply accept, she mentioned.
“If change is ever going to occur, I must cease accepting a few of these payments that I knew have been doubtlessly incorrect,” Panozzo mentioned.
The takeaway: Medical suppliers have broad leeway to find out how they invoice for care, together with by deciding the right way to establish what items or providers have been offered. This implies sufferers might get caught with expenses for unfamiliar or downright weird issues.
And since the legislation would not deal with how suppliers invoice sufferers for preventive providers, odd expenses can crop up even for care that needs to be totally lined.
Analysis additionally exhibits personal fairness possession, which has been growing in specialties like gastroenterology, can result in greater prices for sufferers, in addition to decrease high quality care.
For sufferers, “below federal legislation, there is no such thing as a recourse,” Corlette mentioned.
State regulatory our bodies might go after these suppliers for billing sufferers for lined providers, however that may be a blended bag, Corlette mentioned.
Insurers ought to crack down on this sort of follow with the suppliers taking part of their networks, Corlette mentioned. In any other case, sufferers are caught within the center, left to contest what needs to be “free” care — and on the mercy of the insurance coverage appeals course of.
Well being plans might not catch billing oddities — in any case, for a significant insurer, a cost of $600 is probably not price investigating. That leaves sufferers finally answerable for protecting monitor of what they’re being requested to pay — and talking up if one thing appears suspicious.
Panozzo mentioned the expertise left her feeling defeated, exhausted, and distrustful of America’s well being care system.
Having lived overseas along with her household for nearly 10 years, she mentioned, “I may perform in a well being care system in German higher than I may right here in English.”
KFF Well being Information, previously referred to as Kaiser Well being Information (KHN), is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points and is among the core working packages at KFF — the impartial supply for well being coverage analysis, polling, and journalism.
Emmarie Huetteman of KFF Well being Information edited the digital story, and Taunya English of KFF Well being Information edited the audio story. NPR’s Will Stone edited the audio and digital story.
