Lizzy Banks has stated that she is “bitterly disenchanted” that the World Anti-Doping Company [WADA] has determined to attraction the landmark “No Fault or Negligence” ruling handed to her by UK Anti-Doping [UKAD] after her 9 month anti-doping case.
Chatting with The Telegraph, Banks revealed that she had been knowledgeable that WADA had made the choice to attraction UKAD’s ruling and that the case will now be heard on the Courtroom of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, Switzerland. She additionally defined that she was nonetheless but to study of WADA’s grounds to launch an attraction, or perhaps a date by which her case can be heard in court docket.
Final month, it was revealed that the 33-year-old was knowledgeable in July 2023 by UKAD that she had returned two hostile analytical findings (AAFs); one for formoterol, an bronchial asthma remedy she had been taking, and one for chlortalidone, a diuretic she had by no means heard of, current solely as a small hint.
Initially, Banks confronted a two-year ban, however after offering an abundance of her personal medical analysis, UKAD made a momentous U-turn. The organisation issued a landmark first ‘No Fault of Negligence’ discovering, that means Banks acquired no sanction.
She is now making an attempt to work out how the case will play out.
“I spent the entire of Wednesday afternoon making an attempt to get in touch with them or any person to work out how [the appeal] labored,” Banks informed The Telegraph. “I ultimately acquired maintain of WADA’s legal professionals. They stated that they’d name me again. They didn’t. I then emailed. Additionally they didn’t reply. Then on Thursday, round two o’clock, I acquired a procedural doc from the Courtroom of Arbitration for Sport, laying out when some issues wanted to occur. It nonetheless didn’t say the premise for WADA’s attraction.
“The entire course of is ridiculous. WADA now has 10 days in an effort to file their case to the Courtroom of Arbitration for Sport. And on this 10-day interval, UKAD and I, who are actually on the identical staff successfully, we now have to collectively nominate an arbitrator from a listing of 421 arbitrators. However how are we speculated to nominate an arbitrator if we don’t know what the premise of WADA’s attraction is?”
The most recent race content material, interviews, options, opinions and skilled shopping for guides, direct to your inbox!
Banks had instructed legal professionals and carried out rigorous medical analysis, leaning on her earlier coaching as a health care provider. The method, she stated, price her “nicely over €40,000”, and left her with suicidal ideas.
“My husband and I spent each penny of our financial savings and the massive psychological toll has left deep scars,” Banks wrote final month. “My psychological well being was shattered. I used to be a whole wreck.”
She’s going to now signify herself in court docket as a consequence of being unable to afford legal professionals. She stated that each UKAD and WADA had appointed authorized groups that price as a lot as £600 an hour, and that the cash being spent was “an enormous waste of public funds” because of the anti-doping system itself being the central concern.
“WADA is aware of this. They’ve recognized for years that there was an issue,” she stated. “They created a Contaminants Working Group a couple of years in the past, however they haven’t addressed any of the actual points. We all know that many, many, many athletes have been given sanctions for one thing that they couldn’t presumably have averted.
“Within the assertion from CAS, it says I would like to inform CAS whether or not or not I’m completely happy to ‘pay their respective shares of the superior prices’. However I don’t know the way I can.”
“I’m bitterly disenchanted, in fact, that they’ve appealed,” she added. “However on the similar time, I’m utterly unsurprised. From my expertise, it matches WADA’s method to the evolution of anti-doping guidelines in response to science and environmental circumstances. That one of the best ways to cope with one thing is to simply bury their head within the sand and keep it up.”
Banks has now retired from skilled biking, however stated that she is set to make a distinction along with her case and be sure that the principles are modified.
“They can not get away with treating folks like this,” she stated. “It’s actually inhumane.
“The one silver lining is that I now get my day in court docket. Any individual commented on my Instagram, after I stated ‘They picked on the fallacious individual’. ‘Really, they picked on the fitting individual.’ I hope so.”
WADA’s response
In a press release final month, WADA stated that the case was a “complicated and nuanced space” and {that a} evaluate could be carried out to make sure that Banks’ case had been “handled appropriately underneath the principles.”
WADA stated: “The difficulty of potential contamination is actual and one which WADA is addressing. The WADA Contaminants Working Group was created for the aim of offering skilled recommendation and suggestions almost about prohibited substances that may be prevalent contaminants, primarily based on the perfect obtainable scientific proof. The group accommodates many consultants on this subject from completely different elements of the world.
“Over time, the minimal reporting limits for varied substances have been adjusted to make sure equity for athletes who unintentionally ingest a prohibited substance, whereas defending in opposition to those that would cheat the system. Furthermore, the Code has, via its varied editions, adopted an more and more versatile and tailor-made sanction regime that goals to impose applicable penalties to mirror the character of the anti-doping rule violation.
“A particular provision was launched to permit higher flexibility for instances involving contaminated merchandise. It is a complicated and nuanced space of anti-doping by which WADA at all times strives to strike the fitting stability for the nice of athletes and clear sport.”
